Print Story Environmental Protester nominates himself for a Darwin Award
Health
By rdskutter (Wed Nov 10, 2004 at 09:12:45 AM EST) (all tags)
An article in the guardian opens with the paragraph:

The death of a protester has renewed the dispute about transporting radioactive materials through France by rail, reports Amelia Gentleman

At this point I'm prepared to take the article seriously.



All sympathy for the protester; and all respect for the protests in general is lost upon reading the third paragraph:

Environmental campaigners say that the death of Sebastien Briat, 21, who had chained himself to the railway track in front of a train carrying 12 containers of radioactive waste, illustrated the dangers of this kind of transportation. Activists said the accident showed how difficult it was to guarantee the security of the cargo as it travelled along the nation's rail network.

Now the protesters claim that Sebastian's death shows that trains carrying nuclear waste are dangerous. Presumably if the train had not been carrying nuclear waste it would have left Sebastian unharmed.

Presumably the moral of the story is that these trains are relatively safe compared to other methods of transport. They only become unsafe when loonies tie themselves to the track or when suicidal drivers park across level crossings.

Link to the article.

Cheers Sebastian. Your stupidity made me laugh.

Full discussion: http://www.hulver.com/scoop/story/2004/11/10/91245/042